Kozlowski v. New York State Board of Parole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that prior visa petitions “or other evidence of potential fraud or dilatory tactics may impact the viability of the visa petition underlying the motion.”
• providing that “respondent’s request for a continuance should be supported by particularized facts and evidence”
• noting that prior visa petitions “or other evidence of potential fraud or dilatory tactics may impact the viability of the visa petition underlying the motion.”
• recognizing that IJs do not have jurisdiction to decide visa petitions, however, “in the context of deciding a motion to continue for the USCIS to adjudicate the petition, it is useful for the [IJ] to evaluate the viability of the underlying I-130”
• noting that the DHS’s “unsupported opposition” to a continuance “does not carry much weight”
• explaining that \[a] respondent's criminal history\ is appropriate for the immigration judge to consider when determining whether \the respondent warrants adjustment of status in the exercise of discretion\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).