KOZLOWSKI, SUSAN v. UNILAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an accommodation must be “necessary ‘to assure meaningful access’” (quoting Alexander v. Choate, 469 U.S. 287, 301 (1985))
• noting that Title II’s use of the term “reasonable modifications” tracks other provisions of the Act referring to “reasonable accommodations”
• finding that “assistance of school staff alone and in the absence of [plaintiff’s service dog’s] therapeutic services, [plaintiff] was subjected to additional safety risks,” which was not a reasonable accommodation
• noting that ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims often are addressed “in the same breath”
• explaining how Titles I-III of the ADA have been read to create similar, if not identical, standards
• noting an accommodation is a “term[] of art” within the meaning of the FHA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).