Kozlik v. Emelco, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parties to an employment contract “may override the application of the judicial remedy for breach of a contract by stipulating, in advance, to the sum to be paid in event of a breach”
• “[T]he next question is whether the amount stipulated constitutes liquidated damages and is thus enforceable, or whether it imposes a penalty and is thus unenforceable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).