Koziol v. Standards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding statutes were neutral where they did “not target religion or religious institutions” and “[t]here [was] no allegation of an underlying religious animus”
• upholding Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of free exercise claim because statutes were neutral, generally applicable, and rationally related to a valid government purpose
• neutral educational licensing requirements did not foster excessive entam glemenf; “allowing a religious institution to participate in secular regulatory schemes simply does not violate the Establishment • Clause.”
• statutes were generally applicable because they “appl[ied] equally to secular and religious post-secondary institutions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).