Kozak v. Kozak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[t]he prehearing examination and screening of motions is particularly warranted where the history of the litigation demonstrates the use of repetitive and frivolous motions\
• holding matters \sparked by a personal vendetta\ do not compel oral argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).