Kozak v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the Commission found that a tennis tournament was a recreational event, not a promotional event

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wells v. Enloe
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-08-09· cited 19×
• Bagcraft Corp. v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-12-23· cited 16×
• Chicago Transit Authority v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-10-30· cited 5×
• Pickett v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-08-06· cited 5×
• Glassie v. Papergraphics, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-06-28· cited 4×
• Glassie v. PAPERGRAPHICS
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-06-28· cited 3×
• Woodrum v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-01-24· cited 2×
• Elmhurst Park District v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-10-06· cited 1×
• Pinckneyville Community Hospital v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-03-30
• Bagcraft Corp. v. IC
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-12-23

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jewel Tea Co. v. Industrial Commission
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1955-05-20· cited 39×
• Cary Fire Protection District v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-04-05· cited 13×
• Fischer v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-03-31· cited 13×