Skip to main content
· 12/2/2021

Kowalkowski-Tippett v. Tippett

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 4220

Syllabus

The trial court's finding of financial misconduct in part is not supported by competent, credible evidence however, on remand the court must consider whether the proceeds of the sale of the Florida property were spent on marital or separate property. The trial court abused its discretion when it did not sufficiently comply with the requirements of R.C. 3105.171(C)(1) when determining the division of marital property and did not provide written findings to support its distribution of marital property pursuant to R.C. 3105.171(F). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that appellant gifted artwork to appellee. Assignment of error overruled in part and sustained in part. Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Judges: Dorrian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.