· 10/17/2023
Kowalczyk v. Borough of Portage
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing the “doctrine that legislative enactments should not be construed to render their provisions mere surplusage”
- recognizing the “doctrine that legislative enactments should not be construed to render their provisions mere surplusage”
- recalling the “doctrine that legislative enactments should not be construed to render' their provisions mere surplusage”
- rejecting an interpretation of the Treasury Amendment that would have left it \without any significant effect at all\ because \legislative enactments should not be construed to render their provisions mere surplusage.\
- noting doctrine that statutes should not be construed to render their provisions mere surplusage
- rejecting an interpretation of the Treasury Amendment that would have left it “without any significant effect at all” because “legislative enactments should not be construed to render their provisions mere surplusage.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.