Kovilic v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that raising both section 2-615 and 2-619 claims in a hybrid motion under section 2-619.1 “often causes unneeded complication and confusion”
• “[B]ecause our interpretation of the contracts must be in accordance with the plain and obvious meaning of the words used, and not through providing potentially unintended meaning to those words, we will not read such an interpretation into the contracts here.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).