Skip to main content
· 5/6/1999

Kovach v. Solomon

Citations

  • 732 A.2d 1
  • 1999 Pa. Super. 109
  • 1999 Pa. Super. LEXIS 887

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where the trial court gives a specific reason for ordering a new trial, an appellate court must examine only the stated reason
  • finding a fact finder may be permitted to draw an adverse inference due to a party's failure to produce evidence within his or her control
  • “The narrow question in this case ... is whether the local rule in Northampton County is relevant to whether a witness is ‘equally available’ or ‘peculiarly within the knowledge and reach’ of the party who had earlier stated he or she would call that witness. It is.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McEwen, Popovich, Cirillo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.