· 5/6/1999
Kovach v. Solomon
Citations
- 732 A.2d 1
- 1999 Pa. Super. 109
- 1999 Pa. Super. LEXIS 887
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where the trial court gives a specific reason for ordering a new trial, an appellate court must examine only the stated reason
- finding a fact finder may be permitted to draw an adverse inference due to a party's failure to produce evidence within his or her control
- “The narrow question in this case ... is whether the local rule in Northampton County is relevant to whether a witness is ‘equally available’ or ‘peculiarly within the knowledge and reach’ of the party who had earlier stated he or she would call that witness. It is.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McEwen, Popovich, Cirillo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.