Skip to main content
Texas Supreme Court· 10/21/2011

Kourosh Hemyari v. Stephens

Citations

  • 355 S.W.3d 623
  • 55 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 59
  • 2011 Tex. LEXIS 807
  • 2011 WL 5042017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that an order’s terms are ambiguous if they are “susceptible of more than one reasonable interpretation”
  • acknowledging that an order’s terms are ambiguous if they are “susceptible of more than one reasonable interpretation”
  • reciting that appellate courts interpret ambiguous orders—those that are susceptible of more than one reasonable interpretation—by looking to surrounding circumstances in order to discern their meaning
  • “[U]nder general rules of construction we avoid strictly construing an instrument’s language if it would lead to absurd results.”
  • “Only where an order’s terms are ambiguous—that is, susceptible of more than one reasonable interpretation—do we look to the surrounding circumstances to discern their meaning.”
  • “[U]nder general rules of construction we avoid strictly construing an instrument's language if it would lead to absurd results.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.