Kounitz v. Slaatten

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff failed to allege an injury in fact because he asserted “in the most general fashion” that he had been “chilled in the exercise of his First Amendment rights”
• holding that allegations of emotional distress by husband of wife who was fired, allegedly in retaliation for husband’s exercise of his free speech rights, did not demonstrate an injury sufficient to confer standing
• summarily permitting claims to proceed without any analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).