Skip to main content
· 11/12/1898

Kosztelnik v. Bethlehem Iron Co.

Citations

  • 91 F. 606
  • 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2628

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that appointment of counsel under section 1915 “is a privilege and not a right” and is “a matter within the discretion of the District Court.”
  • describing “the privilege of proceeding in forma pauperis” as “a matter within the discretion of the District Court”
  • noting that “[f]ederal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction”
  • describing the privilege of proceeding in forma pauperis as “a privilege, not a right”
  • describing the privilege of proceeding in forma pauperis as “a privilege, not a right”
  • “The burden is on the party asserting the jurisdiction of the 3 court to show that jurisdiction does, in fact, exist.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.