· 11/12/1898
Kosztelnik v. Bethlehem Iron Co.
Citations
- 91 F. 606
- 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2628
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that appointment of counsel under section 1915 “is a privilege and not a right” and is “a matter within the discretion of the District Court.”
- describing “the privilege of proceeding in forma pauperis” as “a matter within the discretion of the District Court”
- noting that “[f]ederal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction”
- describing the privilege of proceeding in forma pauperis as “a privilege, not a right”
- describing the privilege of proceeding in forma pauperis as “a privilege, not a right”
- “The burden is on the party asserting the jurisdiction of the 3 court to show that jurisdiction does, in fact, exist.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.