Koszola v. Federal Deposit Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellate court reviews “for clear error” “the district court’s finding by clear and convincing evidence that the [employer] would have fired [the employee] regardless of any alleged protected activity”
• holding that the appellate court reviews “for clear error” “the district court’s finding by clear and convincing evidence that the [employer] would have fired [the employee] regardless of any alleged protected activity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).