Kostok v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Plaintiff’s state law claims fail on Eleventh Amendment grounds because such claims “cannot be brought against a state even when [they have] been appended to a federal Constitutional claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Davis v. New York
  Second Circuit· 2002-12-13· cited 150×
• Reynolds v. Giuliani
  S.D. New York· 2000-07-21· cited 35×
• Shakhnes Ex Rel. Shakhnes v. Eggleston
  S.D. New York· 2010-09-30· cited 13×
• Giaquinto v. Commissioner of New York State Department of Health
  New York Court of Appeals· 2008-06-12· cited 13×
• Dennis Haynes v. Hooters of America, LLC
  Eleventh Circuit· 2018-06-19· cited 11×
• Kennedy Building Associates v. Viacom, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 2004-07-15· cited 10×
• Meachem v. Wing
  S.D. New York· 1999-12-09· cited 9×
• Tuchman v. Connecticut
  D. Connecticut· 2002-02-08· cited 8×
• Concourse Rehabilitation & Nursing Center Inc. v. Wing
  Second Circuit· 1998-07-17· cited 1×
• FL Assoc. of Rehab. Fac. v. State of FL Dept. of H
  Eleventh Circuit· 2000-09-01

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
  Supreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 8,956×
• Edelman v. Jordan
  Supreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 6,517×
• Green v. Mansour
  Supreme Court· 1986-01-27· cited 1,617×
• Countyof Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of NY
  Supreme Court· 1985-04-22· cited 600×
• Oberlander v. Perales
  Second Circuit· 1984-06-29· cited 102×
• Kostok v. Thomas
  Second Circuit· 1997-01-15· cited 27×
• Mont v. Heintz
  Second Circuit· 1988-06-01· cited 16×