· 3/8/2001
Koster v. June’s Trucking, Inc
Citations
- 625 N.W.2d 82
- 244 Mich. App. 162
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court erred in failing to conduct an in camera inspection where the trial court ordered the defendants’ entire claim file be turned over without determining whether the work-product privilege protected the documents
- “this Court will not reverse a decision of the trial court where it reaches the right conclusion for the wrong reasons”
- “this Court will not reverse a decision of the trial court where it reaches the right conclusion for the wrong reasons”
- the burden shifts to the party seeking discovery to establish substantial need and undue hardship after the court determines whether the work-product doctrine applies
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bandstra, Gage, Wilder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.