Kostenowczyk v. Nagle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A claim arises in any district in which a substantial part of the acts, 19 events, or omissions occurred that gave rise to the claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shibata v. Carr
  Ninth Circuit· 1929-11-04· cited 8×
• Ex parte Keizo Shibata
  S.D. California· 1929-02-27· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Bitty
  Supreme Court· 1908-02-24· cited 68×
• United States ex rel. Bauder v. Uhl
  Second Circuit· 1914-01-13· cited 25×
• Guiney v. Bonham
  Ninth Circuit· 1919-12-01· cited 13×
• United States ex rel. Femina v. Curran
  Second Circuit· 1926-06-01· cited 9×
• Chun Shee v. Nagle
  Ninth Circuit· 1925-11-23· cited 6×