Kosta v. Connolly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that Rule 36 should not be employed to establish facts that are obviously in dispute
• finding improper Defendants' attempt to “have the Plaintiff ratify what are, in essence, the legal conclusions that the Defendants have attached to the operative facts of the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).