Kosta v. Connolly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that Rule 36 should not be employed to establish facts that are obviously in dispute
• finding improper Defendants' attempt to “have the Plaintiff ratify what are, in essence, the legal conclusions that the Defendants have attached to the operative facts of the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carney v. Internal Revenue Service
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-07-16· cited 177×
• G. H. Bass & Co. v. Fulton County Board of Tax Assessors
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-06-16· cited 37×
• Lakehead Pipe Line Co. v. American Home Assurance Co.
  D. Minnesota· 1997-12-05· cited 35×
• United States v. Branella
  D. New Jersey· 1997-08-07· cited 28×
• U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Gunn
  D. Delaware· 2014-03-04· cited 14×
• Valenti v. Sheeler
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1991-03-27· cited 7×
• McCONKIE v. Nichols
  D. Maine· 2005-10-13· cited 7×
• At&T Universal Card Services Corp. v. Sziel (In Re Sziel)
  N.D. Illinois· 1997-06-11· cited 3×

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
• Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
• Harlow v. Fitzgerald
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
• Anderson v. Creighton
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 12,768×
• United States v. Diebold, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1962-05-14· cited 7,008×
• Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-25· cited 6,061×
• Oyler v. Boles
  Supreme Court· 1962-02-19· cited 1,736×
• Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.
  Third Circuit· 1976-04-02· cited 852×
• Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & Mundy
  Third Circuit· 1985-05-31· cited 476×
• Colburn v. Upper Darby Township
  Third Circuit· 1988-01-26· cited 283×
• Continental Insurance Co. v. Kenneth Bodie
  Third Circuit· 1982-06-28· cited 197×
• Thomas F. Bennis, Roger J. MacLean v. Carson S. Gable, Joseph S. Daddona, City of Allentown
  Third Circuit· 1987-07-30· cited 192×
• Losch v. Borough of Parkesburg
  Third Circuit· 1984-06-14· cited 144×
• Lee v. Mihalich
  Third Circuit· 1988-05-17· cited 102×
• United States v. Shober
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-09-26· cited 19×
• Driver v. Gindy Manufacturing Corp.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1959-10-20· cited 13×
• Peter v. Arrien
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1970-11-17· cited 8×
• United States v. Ettorre
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-01-10· cited 5×