Koseris v. JR Simplot Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pending injunction proceeding did not preclude separate claim for damages arising after injunction action commenced
• pending injunction proceeding did not preclude separate claim for damages arising after injunction action commenced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Heaney v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF GARDEN VAL., ETC.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1978-03-02· cited 20×
• Matthews v. New York Life Insurance Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1968-07-05· cited 13×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Phillips v. City of Pasadena
  California Supreme Court· 1945-10-19· cited 69×
• Armbruster v. Stanton-Pilger Drainage District
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1957-11-15· cited 20×
• Koseris v. JR Simplot Company
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1960-05-19· cited 15×
• Knox v. Reese
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1919-09-23· cited 8×
• Kelley v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1928-08-18· cited 2×