Skip to main content
· 7/13/2000

Koschoff v. Henderson

Citations

  • 109 F. Supp. 2d 332
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11752
  • 2000 WL 1162072

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding that harassment was pervasive and regular where harassing incidents were frequently day-to-day, ongoing events and where incidents spanned the relevant time period
  • holding that mistreatment and disrespect unmotivated by the plaintiff's statutorily-protected trait does not create a hostile work environment
  • concluding that the use of the word “b-h” was not specifically motivated by the plaintiffs sex
  • finding that plaintiff whose disposition changed from cheery to sullen and who exhibited crying outbursts supported a subjective effect
  • denying a hostile work environment claim because, among other things, management harassed “men in roughly the same proportion’’
  • discussing in relation to the subjective effect prong the fact that the plaintiffs disposition changed, that she cried as a result of workplace harassment and that co-workers testified that the plaintiff had been detrimentally affected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Antwerpen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.