Kosarin v. W & S Associates, LP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “extrinsic evidence of the parties’ intent may be considered only if the agreement is ambiguous” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• adopting a more limited scope of a release signed upon termination by a university employee and noting that plaintiff lacked the opportunity to consult counsel before signing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).