Koro Co., Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding assignment champer-tous where made solely to enable plaintiff to sue on the claim
• finding, under New York law, that assignment was champertous in part because “the claim [] was not assigned along with all the other assets”
• finding the assignment was champertous under New York law and therefore null and void
• applying New York's champerty law to the assignment of an antitrust claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).