· 9/29/2008
Kornegay v. AT & T
Citations
- 579 F. Supp. 2d 34
- 2008 WL 4482970
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75432
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- adopting the AT&T’s statement of facts as undisputed because Kornegay’s “statement d[id] not specifically contradict any facts set forth in AT&T’s Statement of Undisputed Facts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paul L. Friedman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.