Skip to main content
· 8/28/2007

Korman v. Walking Co.

Citations

  • 503 F. Supp. 2d 755
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63732
  • 2007 WL 2437958

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that motions for class certification are “for all practical purposes, identical to an opposition to a motion for class certification” and therefore are premature
  • “printing 6+ digits violates FACTA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eduardo C. Robreno

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.