· 10/8/1982
Korman v. Strick
Citations
- 652 P.2d 544
- 133 Ariz. 471
- 1982 Ariz. LEXIS 263
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing criminal and civil contempt; criminal contempt sanctions \solely\ punitive while civil contempt sanctions coercive
- distinguishing criminal and civil contempt; criminal contempt sanctions “solely” punitive while civil contempt sanctions coercive
- “If the means of the coercion [to comply with a court order] ... cannot be removed by compliance with the court’s order, the coercive effect of a civil contempt finding will be weakened.”
- “If the means of the coercion 28 [to comply with a court order] . . . cannot be removed by compliance with the court’s order, the coercive effect of a civil contempt finding will be weakened.”
- identifying detention and fines as mechanisms of civil contempt
- describing imprisonment as a sanction for civil contempt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon, Holohan, Hays, Cameron, Feldman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.