Skip to main content
· 10/8/1982

Korman v. Strick

Citations

  • 652 P.2d 544
  • 133 Ariz. 471
  • 1982 Ariz. LEXIS 263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing criminal and civil contempt; criminal contempt sanctions \solely\ punitive while civil contempt sanctions coercive
  • distinguishing criminal and civil contempt; criminal contempt sanctions “solely” punitive while civil contempt sanctions coercive
  • “If the means of the coercion [to comply with a court order] ... cannot be removed by compliance with the court’s order, the coercive effect of a civil contempt finding will be weakened.”
  • “If the means of the coercion 28 [to comply with a court order] . . . cannot be removed by compliance with the court’s order, the coercive effect of a civil contempt finding will be weakened.”
  • identifying detention and fines as mechanisms of civil contempt
  • describing imprisonment as a sanction for civil contempt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Holohan, Hays, Cameron, Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.