Kori Cioca v. Donald Rumsfeld

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the Chappell, Stanley, Feres and Shearer precedents mandate that courts not permit a Bivens action that challenges military decisionmaking”
• noting that “the Chappell, Stanley, Feres and Shearer precedents mandate that courts not permit a Bivens action that challenges military decisionmaking”
• noting that “no Bivens action will lie where special factors counsel hesitation in creating an implied right of action”
• noting that prudential bars such as abstention represent the kind of threshold questions that may. be resolved before addressing jurisdiction
• warning that courts should not “call into question military discipline and decisionmaking”
• warning that courts should not “call into question military discipline and decisionmaking”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).