· 11/6/2008
Korer v. DANITA CORPORATION
Citations
- 584 F. Supp. 2d 1103
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90664
- 2008 WL 4822210
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that removal was proper because the Carmack Amendment preempted the shipper’s state law claim for an item lost in an interstate shipment
- determining whether removal was proper by asking whether the Carmack Amendment preempted the plaintiff’s state law claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ruben Castillo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.