Kore Buchanan v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “§ 1367(d)’s instruction to ‘toll’ a state limitations period means to hold it in abeyance, 1.e., to stop the clock’’
• holding that “§ 1367(d)’s instruction to ‘toll’ a state limitations period means to hold it in abeyance, i.e., to stop the clock”
• holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d) tolls the statute of limitations for state law 23 claims asserted under § 1367(a
• holding that “§ 1367(d)’s instruction to ‘toll’ a state limitations period means to hold it in abeyance, i.e., to stop the clock”
• holding that “§ 1367(d)’s instruction to ‘toll’ a state limitations period means to hold it in abeyance, i.e., to stop the clock”
• holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d) tolls the statute of limitations for state law claims asserted under § 1367(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).