Korbelik v. Staschke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in a civil proceeding, non-jury, closing argument is a privilege, not a right, and is within the discretion of the court
• finding no abuse of discretion in refusing to allow the plaintiff to make a closing argument where the case involved a short trial with uncomplicated facts and the judge took extensive notes
• \[d]enying closing arguments in a civil bench trial is within a ... court's discretion.\
• finding no abuse of discretion in refusing to allow the plaintiff to make a closing argument where the case involved a short trial with uncomplicated facts and the judge took extensive notes
• finding no abuse of discretion in refusing to allow the plaintiff to make a closing argument where the case involved a short trial with uncomplicated facts and the judge took extensive notes
• finding no abuse of discretion in refusing to allow the plaintiff to make a closing argument where the case involved a short trial with uncomplicated facts and the judge took extensive notes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).