Korb v. Raytheon Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “no improper interference with secured rights” where at-will employee’s speech made him ineffective advocate for company
• finding \no improper interference with secured rights\ where at-will employee's speech made him ineffective advocate for company
• termination did not interfere with employee’s right to free speech where employee made public comments inconsistent with employer’s interests
• no improper interference with secured rights, therefore no violation of G.L.c. 12, §11H, where employer fires an at-will employee who makes public statements in conflict with the corporation’s interests
• employee hired as corporation’s spokesperson publicly expressed views which conflicted with corporation’s economic interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).