Koransky, Bouwer & Poracky, P. v. Bar Plan Mutual Insurance Comp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that law firm was on notice of potential claim even though there was a chance the mistake could be fixed
• interpreting a similar policy provision under Indiana law to find that a reasonable attorney would realize that his client might bring a malpractice claim when his failure to deliver a sales contract compromised the transaction
• “[An insurance policy’s] no- tice requirement … ‘defines the limits of the insurer’s obliga- tion.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).