Korando v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a tire manufacturer was not liable for injury allegedly caused by severely worn tires
• “Strict products liability is not a doctrine of absolute liability; the manufacturer of a product is not an absolute insurer.”
• to recover for a defective product under strict liability, a plaintiff must prove that the product left the manufacturer in an unreasonably dangerous condition
• \Strict products liability is not a doctrine of absolute liability; the manufacturer of a product is not an absolute insurer.\
• to recover for a defective product under strict liability, a plaintiff must prove that the product left the manufacturer in an unreasonably dangerous condition
• to recover for a defective product under strict liability, a plaintiff must prove that the product left the manufacturer in an unreasonably dangerous condition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).