Koral Industries v. Security-Connecticut Life Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disapproving of jury question and instruction which asked whether party acted reasonably in relying on another party’s representation
• explaining in the fraudulent inducement context that a victim of fraud is generally under no duty to use due diligence or proper care to discover the truth
• “When one has been induced to enter into a contract by fraudulent representations, the person committing the fraud cannot defeat a claim for damages based upon a plea that the party defrauded might have discovered the truth by the exercise of proper care.”
• recision a recoverable remedy for fraudulent inducement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).