Kopis v. Savage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fraud “cannot be based on broken promises, unfulfilled predictions, or statements of existing intent which are not executed.”
• holding that money was not a special chattel, in part because “the parties did not agree to set up an escrow account”
• holding Kopis didn’t convert $40,000 where parties didn’t “set up an escrow account or … deliver the money to any third party for safekeeping” and instead “Kopis comingled the $40,000 with his own funds”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).