Kootenai Canyon Ranch, Inc. v. United States Forest Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the QTA was the exclusive means by which a landowner could challenge the scope of the government’s interest in an easement
• dispute over whether certain use of easement was permissive or was granted in easement was a dispute over scope and thus a claim under the QTA was the plaintiff’s exclusive remedy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).