Koontz v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the purported negligence claims were “veiled” contract claims when the claims merely alleged breaches of specific provisions of the parties’ agreement
• finding that architectural firm could not be liable for negligent misrepresentations to potential client for alleged statements regarding the price and timing of the proposed project because all of the alleged representations related to future events, not existing facts
• applying rule to negligent misrepresentation
• applying rule to negligent misrepresentation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).