Koontz v. State

Citations

41 Tex. 570

Syllabus

1. Bad spelling will not vitiate a verdict, if its meaning be evident. 2. Practice in Supreme Court.—Without a statement of facts in a criminal case the appellate court will only consider whether the indictment will sustain the charge and the finding of the jury; nor mil the instructions given or refused by the court be revised. 3. See rules for application for new trial in 'criminal cases.

Judges: Reeves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Keef v. State
Texas Supreme Court· 1876-07-01· cited 11×
Walker v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas· 1883-02-21· cited 1×
Trammell v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas· 1876-07-01
Simms v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas· 1877-07-01
Bronson v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas· 1877-07-01
Johnson v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas· 1877-07-01
Longley v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas· 1878-07-01
Taylor v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas· 1879-07-01
McMillan v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas· 1879-07-01
Kaskie v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas· 1879-07-01
Wooldridge v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas· 1883-02-10
Arrington v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas· 1883-03-17
Wooldridge v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas· 1883-03-15
Wilson v. Territory of Arizona
Arizona Supreme Court· 1900-03-28

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Shaw v. State
Texas Supreme Court· 1865-07-01· cited 27×
Cambpell v. State
Texas Supreme Court· 1861-07-01· cited 8×
Steinlein v. Dial
Texas Supreme Court· 1853-07-01· cited 4×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.