Koontz v. Koontz
Citations
- 83 Wash. 180
- 145 P. 201
- 1915 Wash. LEXIS 674
Syllabus
<p>Wills — Revocation — Marriage— Provision for Wife. Under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 1323, providing that marriage revokes a prior will of the testator, if the wife shall be living at the time of his death, unless provision shall have been made for her by marriage settlement or the wife be provided for or mentioned in the will, an understanding before marriage that, when either should die, the survivor should have no interest in the decedent’s estate, is not a “provision” for the wife by marriage settlement which could toll the revocation of the will.</p> <p>Frauds, Statute of — Contracts in Consideration of Marriage. An understanding before marriage that, when either should die, the survivor should have no interest in the decedent’s estate, is not merely an agreement in contemplation of marriage, but is a promise made “upon consideration of marriage,” and void under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 5289, unless made in writing.</p>
Judges: Ellis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re the Marriage of DewBerryCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-02-03· cited 54×
- Dewberry v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-02-03· cited 51×
- Staley v. Estate of HarberArizona Supreme Court· 1969-01-02· cited 47×
- Union Securities Co. v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1916-10-09· cited 25×
- In re the Estate of MartinWashington Supreme Court· 1923-11-05· cited 22×
- In Re Estate of RomanoWashington Supreme Court· 1952-07-17· cited 19×
- In Re Steele's EstateWashington Supreme Court· 1954-07-22· cited 18×
- Matter of Estate of BurmeisterWashington Supreme Court· 1994-07-28· cited 13×
- Matter of Estate of BurmeisterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-07-12· cited 9×
- Laberee v. RootWashington Supreme Court· 1915-08-31· cited 4×
- Schlaadt v. ZimmermanNinth Circuit· 1953-09-09· cited 2×
- Peterson v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1929-08-03· cited 2×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Adler v. AdlerWashington Supreme Court· 1909-04-12· cited 25×
- Mallory's Adm'rs v. Mallory's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1891-12-03· cited 18×
- Broker v. ScobeyIndiana Supreme Court· 1877-05-15· cited 16×
- White v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1891-11-16· cited 14×
- Southerland v. Southerland's adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1869-09-25· cited 12×
- Schlossmacher v. Beacon Place Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1909-04-13· cited 9×
- Clark v. BakerWashington Supreme Court· 1913-10-24· cited 6×
- Edwards v. MartinAppellate Court of Illinois· 1891-05-21· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.