Skip to main content
· 7/8/1922

Koontz ex rel. Koontz v. Weide

Citations

  • 111 Kan. 709
  • 208 P. 651
  • 1922 Kan. LEXIS 329

Syllabus

<p>syllabus by the court.</p> <p>1. Slander — Words Charging a Felony — Actionable Per Se. In this action for • slander the words used by the. defendant are held to have charged the plaintiff with a felony and of themselves were actionable.</p> <p>2. Same — Admission of Evidence — Rulings. Rulings on the admission of evidence examined and held to be without material error.</p> <p>3. Same — No Error in Instructions. Instructions relating to the slander charged and established by the evidence examined and held to be without prejudicial error.</p> <p>4. Same — No Release or Bar to Recovery of Damages Shovm. After discovering that the crime which defendant had imputed to plaintiff had not been committed, defendant apologized to plaintiff for the wrong and with it gave him a dollar which was retained for a few hours and then returned. Held, that the gift, under the circumstances, did not constitute a release or bar a recovery for slander as there could be no release unless there was a meeting of the minds of the parties and a mutual understanding that the payment and acceptance of the money was in settlement of defendant’s liability.</p> <p>5. Same — Apology or Retraction No Defense. The apology or retraction of defendant did not operate as a bar to a recovery of damages and was only admissible as tending to show an absence of malice and in mitigation of damages.</p> <p>6. Judgment — Return of Verdict — Duty of Clerk to Enter Judgment. Upon a return of a verdict it is the duty of the clerk to enter judgment in conformity to the verdict unless an order is made reserving the case for future argument or consideration.</p> <p>7. Same — Interest on Judgment. Plaintiff in whose favor a verdict is returned cannot be deprived of interest on his judgment by the failure of the clerk to enter the judgment as the law directs.</p> <p>8. Same. A judgment entered allowing interest thereon from the time of the verdict is held not to be erroneous although a motion for a new trial was fil

Judges: Johnston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.