Skip to main content
· 9/15/1986

Koogler v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.

Citations

  • 646 F. Supp. 95
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In assessing the fairness of the proposed compromise, the number of objectors is a factor to be considered .... ”
  • “In the case sub judice, the consent decree itself provides for opting out and we find nothing objectionable in that agreement between the parties.”
  • “A mere boiler-plate approval phrased in appropriate language but unsupported by evaluation of the facts or analysis of the law will not suffice.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • fact that objectors purported to represent fifty percent of class did not prevent settlement
  • “The growing rule is that the trial court may limit its proceeding to whatever is necessary to aid it in reaching an informed, just and reasoned decision.”
  • “Neither should it be forgotten that compromise is the essence of a settlement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bunton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.