· 7/19/1960
Konvalinka v. United States
Citations
- 162 A.2d 778
- 1960 D.C. App. LEXIS 230
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- this court did not find an officer’s testimony objectionable merely because the officer substituted his own words for those used by the young complainant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hood and Quinn, Associate Judges, and Cayton (Chief Judge, Retired) Sitting by Designation Under Code ⧠11-776(b)
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.