Skip to main content
· 8/27/2014

Konoski v. Shekarkhar

Citations

  • 146 So. 3d 89
  • 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13281
  • 2014 WL 4232520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • striking appellee’s appendix, which contained documents outside the record, noting that appellee did not seek leave to file such extra-record documents, and admonishing counsel for filing the unauthorized appendix
  • striking appellee’s appendix, which contained documents outside the record, where the appellee did not seek leave to file such extra-record documents, and admonishing counsel for filing the unauthorized appendix
  • affirming the entry of the final judgment of injunction for protection against domestic violence and noting that the evidentiary issue raised by the appellant on appeal was not preserved for appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lagoa, Salter, Emas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.