Konkar Maritime Enterprises, S.A. v. Compagnie Belge D'Affretement

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “speculation [of evident partiality based on adverse rulings] is clearly insufficient to warrant vacatur of the [arbitration panel’s] award”
• refusing to find misconduct where defendant “has failed to show any prejudice stemming from” the arbitrator’s act
• confirming order to establish a joint escrow account for distribution under the final award
• an arbitrator's evidentiary rulings will not be overturned absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion
• an arbitrator’s evidentiary rulings will not be overturned absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion
• “All parties in an arbitration proceeding are entitled to ... an opportunity to be heard [and] must be allowed to present evidence without unreasonable restriction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).