Skip to main content
· 2/25/2005

Koninklijke Philips Electronics v. Digital Works, Inc.

Citations

  • 358 F. Supp. 2d 328
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2871
  • 2005 WL 468347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting motion to remand but denying motion for attorneys’ fees because the court did “not believe defendant’s removal was frivolous or plainly unreasonable”
  • “A valid forum selection clause establishes sufficient contacts with New York for purposes of jurisdiction and venue.”
  • “A valid forum selection clause establishes sufficient contacts with New York for purposes of jurisdiction and venue.”
  • “A valid forum selection clause establishes sufficient contacts with New York for purposes of jurisdiction and venue.”
  • “It can hardly be unfair to subject a defendant to suit in a place where he has voluntarily agreed to have disputes resolved.”
  • “While it is true that a choice-of-law provision is not, on its own, sufficient to convey personal jurisdiction over a defendant, the same cannot be said of a forum selection clause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William C. Conner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.