Skip to main content
· 4/28/1978

Federal Case

Citations

  • 580 F.2d 601

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that remand to the Secretary for a new decision rather than reinstatement of the last, untainted decision within the agency was appropriate
  • holding that an agency decision that a party is “aggrieved” for purposes of standing to intervene is “entitled to great deference”
  • remanding to the agency, in part, because political pressure “compromised the appearance of the Secretary’s impartiality”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.