Konan v. Carroll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• default judgment vacated absent proper service of process where defendants had not resided at address for over four years and had no actual notice of lawsuit
• service of process at last and usual did not controvert defendant’s affidavit that they had not resided there for five years
• defendant’s Rule 60(b) affidavit listing chronology of residences for period of approximately ten years established that he did not live at address where service was made
• perfunctory recital of general procedures used to check addresses for purposes of “last and usual” service held inadequate to rebut specific factual averments in defendant’s affidavit as to nonresidence and lack of actual notice of the action
• defendant had not resided at address for more than four years
• service improper when defendant no longer lived at address

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).