Skip to main content
· 1/4/2002

Konami (America), Inc. v. Hartford Insurance

Citations

  • 761 N.E.2d 1277
  • 326 Ill. App. 3d 874
  • 260 Ill. Dec. 721
  • 2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in Illinois, an insurer’s duty to defend must be based on an examination of the underlying complaint
  • in the context of patent infringement claims, “something more is required for this type of infringement than the mere advertising of a product”
  • in Illinois, an insurer's duty to defend must be based on an examination of the underlying complaint
  • in the context of patent infringement claims, “something more is required for this type of infringement than the mere advertising of a product”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Geiger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.