Komashko v. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a district court cannot “invoke principles such as collateral estoppel to confer citizenship when doing so would contravene ‘public policy established by Congress’” (quoting I.N.S. v. Pangilinan, 486 U.S. 875, 883 (1988))
• “[Motions to strike are] ordinarily not granted unless the language in the pleading at issue has no possible relation to the controversy and is clearly prejudicial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).