Komarova v. National Credit Acceptance, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the violations that occurred during the continuing course of making harassing phone calls were not barred by the statute of limitations
• “We must nonetheless be mindful of the ease with which the [Rosenthal Act] could be circumvented if the litigation privilege applied. In that event, unfair debt collection practices could be immunized merely by filing suit on the debt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).