Kolstad v. Rankin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellate court need not consider denial of property owners’ request for TRO to restrain gun range to abate zoning violations since ample other grounds for granting TRO were present
• “Any unreasonable, unwarranted, or unlawful use of one’s property such that another’s use and enjoyment of his property is invaded by a material annoyance, inconvenience, discomfort, or hurt is a nuisance.” (Emphasis added.)
• “Any unreasonable, unwarranted, or unlawful use of one’s property such that another’s use and enjoyment of his property is invaded by a material annoyance, inconvenience, discomfort, or hurt is a nuisance.” (Emphasis added.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).